Cases 51 - 60 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ji Chang Son et al v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
K. M. S. and Ji Chang Son
Defendant:
Tesla Motors, Inc.
Torrey Love et al v. State of California Department of Education et al
as 5:2016cv02410
Plaintiff:
A Voice For Choice Inc, A. B., Courtney Barrow and others
Unknown:
James Leon Moultrie, III, James Leon Moultrie, III, James Leon Moultrie, III and others
Defendant:
Edmund G Brown, Jr, Kamala Harris, Dr Karen Smith and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08589
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCullom v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv03299
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. McCullom
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Department, Gregory J. Ahern, T. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.S. et al v. County of Ventura et al
as 2:2016cv03084
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, California Forensic Medical Group, County of Ventura and others
Plaintiff:
O. M. and M. S.
E.T. et al v. North American Federation of Temple Youth et al
as 2:2015cv09561
Plaintiff:
A. B., Z. G., M. S. and others
Defendant:
Does, NFTY Southern California, North American Federation of Temple Youth and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez-Rangel v. Copenhaver et al
as 1:2014cv01175
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lopez-Rangel
Defendant:
Paul Copenhaver , M. S. Mettry , Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
M S International, Inc. v. BR Construction & Stone, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01403
Defendant:
BR Construction & Stone, Inc., Stefan Bolozan, Does and others
Plaintiff:
M S International, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
