Cases 51 - 60 of 280
McCullough v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv05055
Petitioner:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullough v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv05054
Plaintiff:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Randy Akies, Cpt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boston v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv04947
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Boston
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2022cv04925
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Sheriff Melody Maddox, Governor Brian Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwine v. Mosely et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Goodwine
Defendant:
Chuck Mosely, Captain Terry Mays, Lieutenant Matt Spell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivey et al v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2022cv04836
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey and Marcus D. Ivey
Defendant:
Adele P. Grubbs, David Emerson, Catherine M. Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cato v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04679
Petitioner:
Xavier Cato
Respondent:
Randy Akies, Melody M. Maddox and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingo v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv04686
Petitioner:
Rasheed Wingo
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04508
Plaintiff:
De'Onte Miller
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Randy Akies, Sgt. Friday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingo v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wingo
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Randy Akies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
