Cases 51 - 60 of 495
Coleman v. Morris et al
as 4:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Warden Unknown Siamon, Unknown Mathis and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Martin v. Marshall
as 3:2020cv00460
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatten v. MDOC, et al
as 4:2020cv00107
Defendant:
ARP Director Richard Pennington, Warden Lee Simon, Superintendent Marshall Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Marshall v. Max Hughes Trucking Company of Troy, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Plaintiff:
Larry Marshall
Defendant:
Randell Davis and Max Hughes Trucking Company of Troy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2020cv00197
Defendant:
Unknown Reach, Melissa Jenkins, Unknown Mom's and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogleman v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Defendant:
John Does I - X, Warden Marshall Turner, Commissioner Tommy Taylor and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Marshall David Gregory
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hickman v. Turner et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Warden Lee Simon, Lieutenant Hamp, C/O Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Earl Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Marshal Turner, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Deonta Latravin Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hearn v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 1:2020cv00097
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Marshall Turner
Petitioner:
Michael Henry Hearn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
