Cases 51 - 60 of 690
Ash v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00892
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linn Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Runquist v. Adkins et al
as 2:2016at01015
Defendant:
Scott Adkins, Inc. Medtronic and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Terry Runquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Medtronic et al
as 2:2016at01014
Defendant:
Medtronic and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runquist v. Adkins et al
as 2:2016cv01947
Defendant:
Scott Adkins, Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Terry Runquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd Potolicchio v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-6069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD L. POTOLICCHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC USA INC, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. and others
Meeks et al v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jessica Meeks and Jasmine Meeks
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robby Waguespack, et al v. Medtronic, Incorporated, et al
as 16-30594
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBBY J. WAGUESPACK, STEPHEN POWELL and LLOYD LILE LINDSEY, III
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
K2M, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INCORPORATED
In re: Medtronic, Incorporated, et al
as 16-30595
Petitioner:
In re: MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
ROBBY J. WAGUESPACK, STEPHEN POWELL, LLOYD LILE LINDSEY, III and others
Bryant Lyles v. Medtronic, Incorporated
as 16-30517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYANT LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INCORPORATED
Powell v. Medtronic Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00242
Intervenor Plaintiff:
K2M, Inc.
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
