Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Duffy v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Army Corp of Engineers, M. Mange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Fidlar Acquisition Co. v. First American Data Tree LLC
as 4:2012cv04099
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael Costello
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
First American Data Tree LLC
Defendant:
Illinois Press Association
Plaintiff:
Fidlar Acquisition Co. d/b/a Fidlar Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Lonnie King and Blair Rucker
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg and Michael Costello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Warrington et al
as 1:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Warrington, Depp, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
