Cases 51 - 60 of 274
Stewart, Timothy v. Thompson, Cherie et al
as 3:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Cherie L. Thompson, Andrew P. Banks, Lt. Blazer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Arndt, Jim et al
as 3:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Jim Arndt, Andrew P. Banks, Monetta Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ofc. John Doe #1, Ofc. John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ronald Sutherland, Jim Ardnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
LaMondre Moore
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Cromwell, Security Director John Congdon, Captain Chad Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore, Dexter v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00384
Petitioner:
Dexter Moore
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Traxler v. Shertz et al
as 2:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lyle F Traxler
Defendant:
Brian Shertz, Ashley Haseleu, Brian Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tegels
as 2:2022cv00717
Petitioner:
Andreas L Moore
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Pioneer Metal Finishing LLC
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moore
Defendant:
Pioneer Metal Finishing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Samuel J White
Defendant:
Mary A Moore, Randall R Hepp, Emily E Propson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
