Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Muhammad v. Bedford Nissan, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01947
Plaintiff:
Darius Muhammad
Defendant:
Bedford Nissan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Summers-Eskridge v. Kaschubeck et al
as 2:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
J Laverne Summers-Eskridge
Defendant:
John Kaschubeck , Mohamed H Abib , Muhammad N Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasir v. Shah et al
as 2:2010cv01003
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Nasir
Defendant:
Asfa Shah, Ahad shah and Ismat Arrus Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Johnson et al
as 5:2010cv01771
Plaintiff:
Jerry Muhammad
Defendant:
Don Johnson and City of Aurora Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv00151
Petitioner:
Mustafa Muhammad
Respondent:
Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schafer Oil Company Inc v. Anna Petroleum LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Schafer Oil Company Inc and Schafer Oil Company Inc
Defendant:
Anna Petroleum LLC and Muhammad Saeed Choudhry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Muhammad v. Barney et al
as 2:2009cv00661
Plaintiff:
Chris Shabazz Muhammad
Defendant:
Barney, L Mahlman, Brian Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Barney et al
as 3:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
Chris Shabazz Muhammad
Defendant:
Barney, L Mahlman, Brian Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Barney et al
as 1:2009cv00547
Plaintiff:
Chris Shabazz Muhammad
Defendant:
Barney, L Mahlman, Brian Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riaz v. Lakhsh, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01387
Plaintiff:
Muhammad J. Riaz and Muhammad J. Riaz
Defendant:
Lakhsh, Inc., Prabhudas Lakhani, Rajen P. Lakhani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
