Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
DE SOUZA LIMA et al v. LINEA AEREA MERIDA INTERNACIONAL DE AVIACION et al
as 1:2020cv23631
Plaintiff:
FLORA TARQUI AVILA, DAIELLI FAUSTINO KEMITC DA SILVA, DICLEIA JOHANN DE JESUS and others
Defendant:
RICARDO ALBERTO ALBACETE VIDAL, BISA SEGUROS Y REASEGUROS, S.A., John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Souza Neto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv04369
Plaintiff:
Jair Souza Neto
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
USA v. Martin Viveros
as 20-10215
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN VIVEROS, also known as Don Neto, also known as Rodolfo Dominguez-Rosas
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Neto-Costa v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 0:2020cv60193
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Neto-Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Naveda v. All Dogs in the City, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00292
Defendant:
All Dogs in the City, Inc., Francisco Neto and Renan Da Silva
Plaintiff:
Luz Angelica Naveda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Naveda v. All Dogs in the City, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Defendant:
All Dogs in the City, Inc., Francisco Neto and Renan Da Silva
Plaintiff:
Luz Angelica Naveda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
