Cases 51 - 60 of 265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv01011
Plaintiff:
Aimee Davis
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections , Robert Smith , Andrea Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01633
Plaintiff:
EUGENE NORRIS SCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOLLEY et al v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
as 2:2016cv01480
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL HOLLEY , ADRIANNE CORBIN , APRIL SMALLS and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.R. v. Norris et al
as 3:2015cv01780
Plaintiff:
A.R.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Norris , James Tallerico and Montrose Area School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NORRIS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
as 2:2015cv04741
Plaintiff:
JASON NORRIS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Counter_claimant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Counter_defendant:
JASON NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS v. TOP LOCK CORPORATION et al
as 5:2015cv02687
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NORRIS, SR.
Defendant:
TOP LOCK CORPORATION , SONNY SCAFFOLDING, SONNY PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORRIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02565
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LYNN NORRIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWTON v. O'NEILL et al
as 2:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
FRED LAWTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH O'NEILL, JOHN J. NORRIS, RISA VETRIFERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
