Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Duncan v. City of Sandy Springs et al
as 1:2019cv01129
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Sandy Springs, Officer Ryan Gehricke and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR et al
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER PAQUETTE, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR and others
Plaintiff:
JARVIS O'NEIL ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivins v. Carswell et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Antonio Carswell, FNU Given and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Sam Bivins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Depeiza et al v. The City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv05117
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Janet Jackson and The City of East Point, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Christina Monique Carter-Harper and Audrey Depeiza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Deputy Warden Webb, Warden Laughlin and others
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Davis and Warden Welkes
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Paul et al
as 1:2017cv04770
Plaintiff:
Malachi Jacob Frazier
Defendant:
K. Paul, K. Greer, C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Paul et al
as 1:2017cv04470
Plaintiff:
Malachi Jacob Frazier
Defendant:
K. Paul, K. Greer, C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Detention Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2016cv02556
Plaintiff:
Clarence Darral Ruffin
Defendant:
Detention Officer John Doe, Detention Sergeant Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2014cv02720
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Roberts
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Jeffery Henderson and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
