Cases 51 - 60 of 616
Custer v. Watkins et al
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Cameesha Turner, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Watkins et al
as 1:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Carmisha Turner, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Diane Powers, . Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Russell Owen, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02880
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Owen and Carole Ann Owen
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Custer v. Hart et al
as 1:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Hart, . Owens, . Neilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50363
Plaintiff:
Brett K Owens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rojas v. Dream Big Pac et al
as 1:2022cv05638
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Dream Big Pac and Owen Burgess
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lonzo v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv05369
Plaintiff:
Barney Lonzo
Defendant:
Christopher Owens, Abel Leon, Robert Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
v. Gaffner et al
as 1:2022cv01319
Defendant:
Trisha Gaffner, Kingsley Keys, Mallory Brittenham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
