Cases 51 - 60 of 657
Owen v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Shawne Owen
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Clarke
as 3:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Keith Owens
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Blue River Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jason Tyler Lewis
Cross Claimant:
Blue River Partners, LLC
Defendant:
William Douglas Owens, Nay, LLC and Alireza Saadati
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Hoehn v. Fuller et al
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Vito A. Hoehn
Defendant:
Shannon Fuller, Mallisa Owens, Keith Almarode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zehrbach v. Laria et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Darus Zehrbach
Defendant:
Mark J Laria, Jefte Cabantac Owen and Multiple unknown or as yet by name not identified US Customs Norfolk and US DOT Norfolk agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Wilson v. White
as 3:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Claude Owen Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. White
as 7:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Claude Owen Wilson
Respondent:
Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moseley v. Meggison et al
as 2:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Litonia Victoria Dozier Moseley
Defendant:
Antron Depaul Meggison, Shelly Rodgers, Meosha Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McCoy et al
as 7:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Jones
Defendant:
McCoy, B. Hurley, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
