Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Payne et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
Christopher Payne , Crystal Payne and Rusty Parr
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. , Union Tank Car Company, Michael Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Payne et al
as 4:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Clinton J. Payne, Michael Lombard, Adam Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. USA
as 2:2016cv00165
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby Lynn Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace v. Holloway et al
as 2:2016cv02390
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wallace
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Fitts, Thomas Shells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. National Mutual Insurance Company et al (TWP1)
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
David R. Payne
Defendant:
National Mutual Insurance Company, Celina Insurance Group and Robert Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
King et al v. Commissioner Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine King and Chastity Parham
Defendant:
Commissioner Department of Human Services, State of Tennessee Governor, Deborah Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Payne
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archer v. City of Memphis, et al.
as 2:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
John W. Archer
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Joseph Payne and Larry Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
