Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Stefanik v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010mc30029
Petitioner: Thomas Stefanik
Respondent: Massachusetts Department of Correction, Kevin Burke, Joseph D. McDonald and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11820
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davenport v. Plymouth County Courthouse
as 1:2010cv10854
Plaintiff: Corleen Davenport
Defendant: Plymouth County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Doris et al
as 1:2009cv10916
Plaintiff: Daryle Smith
Defendant: Kathleen Doris, Plymouth County Police Department, Criminal History Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10305
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv11648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Brandolini et al
as 1:2008cv11478
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Ronald Brandolini, Emery Martin, Captain Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 1:2008cv11378
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network, Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joe McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11380
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11292
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?