Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Powell v. Speidelberg et al
as 1:2017cv03657
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ann Powell
Defendant:
Speidelberg and Sperry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connor-Lopez et al v. Aerco International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03596
Plaintiff:
Lynda Connor-Lopez, Gail Rochester, Angelina Marie Chapman and others
Defendant:
Aerco, International, Inc. , Alfa Laval Inc. , Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane, Inc. , Industrial Holdings Corporation , The Nash Engineering Company and others
Cross_defendant:
John Crane, Inc. , 3M Company, Aerco, International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. Baltimore Clayworks, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03395
Plaintiff:
B. Devon Powell
Defendant:
Baltimore Clayworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smith v. Dovey et al
as 1:2017cv03232
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Richard D. Dovey, James R. Younker, Bernard B. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
powell v. Baltimore Clayworks
as 1:2017cv03070
Plaintiff:
devon powell
Defendant:
Baltimore Clayworks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
APG Housing, LLC v. Powell
as 1:2017cv01941
Plaintiff:
APG Housing, LLC
Defendant:
Carlos Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell v. Mason et al
as 1:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Bonnie G. Powell
Defendant:
Marvin Jamel Mason and Eastern Lift Truck Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. The Community Clinic, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Valene Powell
Defendant:
The Community Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Powell v. Stavely
as 1:2016cv03871
Plaintiff:
Tisha Powell
Defendant:
Adam Stavely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
