Cases 51 - 60 of 261
Golden v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv07743
Plaintiff:
Eric George Golden
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Micheal Randle, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Elijah Santiago
Defendant:
S A Godinez, David Rednour, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Gordinez et al
as 3:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
Henry L Mack
Defendant:
Director Gordinez, Warden Achinson, Warden Rednour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Robinson v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 12-2936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL J. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, OFFICER REDNOUR, Chief Administrative Officer, MISS STOCK, Deputy Warden of Operations and others
Chester O'Quinn v. Dave Rednour, et al
as 12-2935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER O'QUINN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE REDNOUR, E. KAESBERG, Publication Review Officer, Menard CC, BETSY SPILLER, Case Worker, Menard CC and others
McCaleb v. Rednour
as 3:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Corbett McCaleb
Defendant:
David A Rednour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. Fahim et al
as 3:2012cv00877
Plaintiff:
Eddie J Sykes
Defendant:
Magid Fahim, J Shepherd, Hillerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rednour
as 1:2012cv06270
Petitioner:
Robert Brown
Respondent:
David Rednour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rednour et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv03421
Plaintiff:
Nora Rednour and Martin Rednour
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norington v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00807
Plaintiff:
David Norington
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, S A Godines, David A Rednour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
