Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Richemont International, S.A et al v. Cenaiko
as 0:2009cv03189
Plaintiff:
Richemont International, S.A, Richemont International, S.A, Richemont International, S.A and others
Defendant:
Nicholas Cenaiko
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Andre Fleury, et al v. Richemont North America, Inc.
as 08-16995
Plaintiff:
ANDRE FLEURY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIZ HART, MIKE MERTABAN, CHARLES CLEVES and others
Appellant:
MARY MEYER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHEMONT NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Deleware corporation and successor to Cartier, Inc.
Andre Fleury, et al v. Richemont North America, Inc.
as 08-16724
Plaintiff:
ANDRE FLEURY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIZ HART, MIKE MERTABAN, CHARLES CLEVES and others
Appellant:
MARY MEYER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHEMONT NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Deleware corporation and successor to Cartier, Inc.
Ware et al v. Coach, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Ware, Paul N. Ware, Paul N. Ware and others
Defendant:
Coach, Inc., Coach, Inc., Coach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richemont North America, Inc. et al v. Sweepstakes Clearinghouse
as 1:2007cv06091
Plaintiff:
Richemont North America, Inc., Richemont North America, Inc., Cartier International, N.V. and others
Defendant:
Sweepstakes Clearinghouse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ware et al v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Ware and Financial Systems Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Aeropostale, Inc., Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Debtor:
West Marine Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
