Cases 51 - 60 of 286
Sankofa et al v. Rose et al
as 4:2021cv11468
Defendant:
Adam Kusch, Matthew Rose, Richard Birmingham and others
Plaintiff:
Shanelle Thomas and Camara Sankofa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercer et al v. Edward Rose & Sons, Inc. d/b/a The Crossings Apartments et al
as 2:2021cv11336
Plaintiff:
Ron Mercer, Ned Newhof, The Fair Housing Center of West Michigan and others
Defendant:
Edward Rose Company and Edward Rose & Sons, Inc. d/b/a The Crossings Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lucas #596167 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00299
Defendant:
Unknown Myiers, Annette Rose Smedley, Muskegon, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Lucas #596167
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Villa at Rose City, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10081
Defendant:
Villa Healthcare Services, LLC and The Villa at Rose City, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acuity v. Stellar et al
as 1:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Twisted Oak Construction, Inc., Michelle Rose, James Breckenridge and others
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rose et al v. Pinon
as 5:2020cv12988
Plaintiff:
Jacque Passino and Gregory Rose
Defendant:
William Pinon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaeffer v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2020cv12620
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rose Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trust v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
as 2:2020cv12409
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Shelby Rose Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford et al v. Rose Acceptance
as 1:2020cv00797
Defendant:
Rose Acceptance
Plaintiff:
Tina Crawford and James Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv11166
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
