Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Bell v. Parker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00444
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant: Catherine Parker, Xiaomei Wang, Beverly Dawn Trca-Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Sherlin v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00207
Plaintiff: Ruth Sherlin
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tate v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00195
Plaintiff: Ruth A. Tate
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
High v. ARAMARK Corporation
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff: Reba Ruth Hill High
Defendant: ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv00040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00008
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREER v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00143
Plaintiff: RUTH A GREER
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCCURDY
as 1:2014mc00002
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RUTH L. MCCURDY
Ruth v. City of Creedmoor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00862
Plaintiff: Michael Ruth
Defendant: City of Creedmoor, Robert G. Morris and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabor et al v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff: Noelle Ruth Tabor and Jacquelyn E. Walker
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?