Cases 51 - 60 of 1,014
Madrid v. Shinn et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Johnny Madrid
Defendant:
David Shinn, James Brissell and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez Barraza
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fizer v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Gary Fizer
Defendant:
David Shinn and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez #136011 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Oger Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buffington v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08018
Petitioner:
Charles Buffington
Respondent:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crouch #321149 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08007
Petitioner:
Dustin D Crouch
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taheny v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
John Taheny
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Sharon Joshua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dulay #303660 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Dilpreet Singh Dulay
Defendant:
David Shinn, Brianna Betencourt, Angelhica Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Tramane Lopez Mitchell
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08023
Petitioner:
Frank Winfield Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
