Cases 51 - 60 of 486
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. Commissioner of Corr. et al
as 3:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corr., Caron, Alejandro Bobadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ann K Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Smith
Defendant:
Ted Lamont, Judith Abigail Daley and Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Rapaport v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Avi Smith-Rapaport
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shand v. Butricks et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Kenneth Butricks, Jennifer Peterson, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kim et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Yong Cha Kim, Dae S. Kim, Broome Co-Operative Insurance Company and others
Johnson v. Hilton et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Aaron M Hilton, Laura E Lufkin, Charles Tirone and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
