Cases 51 - 60 of 150
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2018cv00965
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mike Pompeo, United States Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Schweitzer
as 4:2018cv00487
Petitioner:
Melvin Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith, et al. v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00081
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debra Griffith , Tiffany Aldrich , Clayton Beagle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grimm et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Grimm , Melanie I Grimm and KBA News, LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Shaw, Clark County Board of County Commissioners and New Carlisle, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimm et al v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Grimm , Melanie I Grimm and KBA News, LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Shaw , Clark County Board of County Commissioners and New Carlisle, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton Corporation v. Heinemann Electric Canada Limited et al
as 1:2017cv02443
Defendant:
Heinemann Electric Canada Limited and D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amill v. Schiffer et al
as 3:2017cv02217
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Amill
Defendant:
Joseph Schiffer, Antonio Rodriques, Pam Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettendorf et al v. Lytle et al
as 2:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
Tracy Bettendorf and Carey Ackley
Defendant:
Chester Lytle, Keith Washburn, Jeremy Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2017cv01476
Plaintiff:
William Robert Dixon
Defendant:
Coleman, Delacruz, Godsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
