Cases 51 - 60 of 143
FERRANTE v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2018cv00227
Defendant:
SHERYL BROWN, GILCHRIST COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ROBERT D SCHULTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JOYCE N FERRANTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toliver-Hines v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2018cv24640
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Toliver-Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hess v. Sycamore Concierge LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Hess
Defendant:
Allen Furrer and Sycamore Concierge LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Strode et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Strode and James Strode
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Production, Inc. and Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. OOMA, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Taylor
Defendant:
OOMA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
FREEMAN et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
SHERYL ANN FREEMAN and WADE P FREEMAN, SR
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GULLETT v. COIL et al
as 4:2017cv00532
Petitioner:
TAQUAN GULLETT
Respondent:
CRAIG COIL, JOETTA CAMPBELL, IRISH ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Osborne Associates, Inc. v. Cangemi et al
as 3:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
Osborne Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Sheryl Cangemi , Julie Calianno and Silver Salons & Spas LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Gullett-El et al v. Corrigan et al
as 3:2017cv00881
Plaintiff:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El, Syteria Hephzibah-El and Aamaru Alien Religious Consul Association
Defendant:
Timothy J. Corrigan, Sean Patrick Flynn, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dye v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 8:2017cv01687
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Dye
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
