Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simms v. Hearst Communications Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01384
Plaintiff:
Celisa Simms
Defendant:
Hearst Communications Inc. and Kurt Vantosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Johnson et al v. David Mazza et al
as 2:2015cv09183
Plaintiff:
Alacrity Capital Offshore Fund, LTD., Gemini Partners, Inc., Matthew Johnson and others
Defendant:
Christopher Allegretti, Does, HA and W Wealth Management LLC and others
Brian Trenz v. On-Line Administrators, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08356
Plaintiff:
Caitlyn Farrell, Francis Breidenbach, Brian Trenz and others
Defendant:
Does 1-5, On-Line Administrators, Inc., Volkswagen Group America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Moody v. Simms et al
as 3:2015cv04198
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Moody
Defendant:
Simms, Bliss, Chiba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marguise Caliz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv05161
Plaintiff:
Marquise Elmo Caliz
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Deputy Simms, Unknown and others
Karmen Ambarchian et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02929
Plaintiff:
Karmen Ambarchian, Veganush Antonyan, Wanda Lane and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Reeves v. Simm Associates, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Wade Reeves
Defendant:
Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Heath Adams et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
Heath Adams, Milan Ayers, Rudoph Baca and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Supafly Entertainment, Inc. v. IM Music, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04163
Defendant:
IM Music, Inc., Margo Simms and Londell Smith
Plaintiff:
Supafly Entertainment, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
