Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bridge Premium Finance, LLC (f/k/a Berjac of Colorado, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02131
Defendant:
Bride Premium Finance, LLC , Michael J. Turnock and William P. Sullivan, ll
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Scott v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Darrell K. Scott
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02072
Plaintiff:
Arnold A. Cary
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humood v. City of Aurora, Colorado, The
as 1:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
Abeer Humood
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Colorado, The, Wilkinson, Jason Condreay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sullivan et al v. Delta Enterprise, Corp.
as 1:2011cv01731
Plaintiff:
Amanda (I) Sullivan , Amanda Sullivan , Christopher (I) Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Delta Enterprise, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Scott et al
as 1:2011cv01430
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kenneth Scott and JoAnn Scott
Interested_party:
Terry Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 248
Righthaven LLC v. Recommended Reading, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Defendant:
Recommended Reading, Inc., Christopher McGill, Nathaniel Collinsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
