Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Diethelm v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2009cv02546
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Diethelm and Stephanie Diethelm
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Davis v. Apple Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01133
Plaintiff:
Greg L. Davis
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Franklin v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00704
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Franklin
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Little v. T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01827
Plaintiff:
Melissa K. Little, Melissa K. Little and Melissa K. Little
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Crutchfield v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 5:2008cv02426
Plaintiff:
Steven Crutchfield
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2008cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jim Morris, Jim Morris, Jim Morris and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless Inc, Sprint-Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cotton et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Cotton, Jennifer Marie Cotton, Jennifer Marie Cotton and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC, ALT Inc and WesTower Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
