Cases 51 - 60 of 1,237
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11294
Plaintiff:
Brian G Jones
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Unimax Communications LLC v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
UNIMAX Communications, LLC and Unimax Communications LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aspen Networks, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Aspen Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Rouse v. T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv16028
Plaintiff:
Hank Rouse
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ali v. AT and T et al
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT and T, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mann v. Mayorkas et al
as 6:2023cv00771
Defendant:
Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas, The National Security Council and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
