Cases 51 - 60 of 93
DAVIS v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE MOORE
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, CARLTON POWELL, V WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CARLTON POWERS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. THOMAS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM
as 7:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MOORE, JR
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS v. Powers et al
as 7:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant:
CARLTON POWERS, STEVE JONES, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNEY-MANNING v. THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
as 7:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CONNEY-MANNING
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCKINNEY v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY JEROME MCKINNEY, JR
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, BRIAN METCALF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE, et al v. THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 7:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DONNA WHITE and ROBERT W WHITE
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE , ROBERT RAY AUMAN, DAVID DEWAYNE MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-14530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
