Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Johnson v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01384
Petitioner:
Ronnie Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennison v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv01383
Petitioner:
Henry L. Dennison, Jr.
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durrant v. Bickell et al
as 4:2014cv01099
Petitioner:
Sean Durrant
Respondent:
Tabb Bickell and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Tavares et al
as 3:2014cv00991
Plaintiff:
Carlton Lane
Defendant:
Joseph F Tavares, Paula C Price, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv02702
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , PHILADELPHIA COUNTY , PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv02718
Petitioner:
JAVIER GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 4:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, Bio Reference Labs, Wexford Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stokes
Defendant:
John Wetzel and Tabb Bickell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv02195
Petitioner:
KIRK A. BROWN
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAYNE v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv02198
Petitioner:
OMAR PAYNE
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL , R. SETH WILLIAMS , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
