Cases 51 - 60 of 2,179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hughes et al v. Nationstar
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Hughes, Brian Reno and Terri Reno
Defendant:
Nationstar doing business as Mr Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Duncan v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Clifford A. Brown, Leon Grizzard and Terry Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen-Hall v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Terri Allen-Hall
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry v. McManus
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Richard S. Terry
Respondent:
Wendy McManus and Chris Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith et al v. Marshall et al
as 9:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luke Smith and Walter Matthews
Defendant:
Terry Marshall and T.E.A.M. Logistics Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Terri Hopkins, Tonia Hopkins, Chris Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry Black's Barbecue, LLC v. U.S. Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01545
Plaintiff:
Terry Black's Barbecue, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Foods, Inc. and JBS USA Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
