Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Mansy v. Kemper et al
as 2:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Michael W Mansy
Defendant:
Gary Kemper and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mansy v. Kemper et al
as 3:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michael W Mansy
Defendant:
Gary Kemper and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conner v. The United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2011cv02476
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service and The United States Department of Labor's Office of Worker's Compensation Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Tallent v. Prescott et al
as 3:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ann Tallent
Defendant:
Richard Alan Prescott and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpeth Financial Services, LLC v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2010cv00998
Plaintiff:
Harpeth Financial Services, LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Dannette M. Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dyrenko v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Edward Dyrenko
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Grandberry v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2009cv02300
Plaintiff:
William Grandberry and William Grandberry
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, John E. Potter and Thomas W. Pawlowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
