Cases 51 - 60 of 367
Close et al v. Eldo Organic, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Steve Close, Alex Close, Stephen Close and others
Defendant:
Jack Mitchell, BesaMe Wellness IP, LLC, Tom Elafross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Close v. Close et al
as 2:2022oe01629
Plaintiff:
Stephen Close
Defendant:
Alexander Close, Jack Mitchell, BesaMe Wellness IP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vokurka v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
JANICE VOKURKA
Defendant:
WARDEN TOM SCHWEITZER, CAPTAIN CHAMBERLAIN, CAPTAIN ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steagall v. Whitney Woods Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steagall
Defendant:
Tom Jones, Donald J. Acquista, James Berutti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seger et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05660
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Seger and Tom Seger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spaeth v. TJM Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02160
Plaintiff:
John Spaeth
Defendant:
TJM Medical, Inc., Tom McTighe, Thomas J. McTighe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
as 1:2021cv00648
Petitioner:
Mohamed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
as 2:2021cv05065
Petitioner:
Mohamed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stivers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05000
Plaintiff:
Tom Stivers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
