Cases 51 - 60 of 1,386
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03998
Petitioner:
Tony Henry Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Jimenez et al
as 5:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Quentin Jones
Defendant:
Attorney Tony Jimenez, II, FNU Figurora, Keefe Commissary Staff Member and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00454
Petitioner:
Dianne L. Weaver, Philip J. Emerson, Jr. and P J Emerson
Respondent:
Jerry Parker and Alfonso Charles
Defendant:
Kelly Cole, Holly Lake Ranch Association (HLRA), Patty Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Tony H Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browning v. USA
as 3:2023cv01882
Petitioner:
Tony Demon Browning
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fuentes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tony Fuentes
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hoang Tran v. Houston Police Department
as 4:2023cv02817
Plaintiff:
Thien Tony Hoang Tran
Defendant:
Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hoang Tran v. District Attorney of Houston
as 4:2023cv02819
Plaintiff:
Thien Tony Hoang Tran
Defendant:
District Attorney of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keva Hotel, LP v. RLI Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
KEVA HOTEL, LP
Defendant:
RLI CORP. D/B/A MT. HAWLEY, MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, TONY AVILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
