Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Myers v. Tulalip Tribes Inc.
as 2:2011cv01348
Respondent:
Tulalip Tribes Inc.
Petitioner:
Fred Charles Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Tregoning et al v. Tulalip Casino & Bingo et al
as 2:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Glenn M Wallace
Defendant:
Tulalip Casino & Bingo, Tulalip Tribes of Washington, Sharon Renecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
USA v. Oregon et al
as 3:1968cv00513
Intervenor Defendant:
Alaska Trollers Association
503) 222-4428 (fax:
Bradford H. Lamb
Amicu:
Columbia River Fisherman's Protective Union, Lummi Inidan Nation, Northwest Gillnetter's Association and others
Intervenor:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Nation and others
Respondent:
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Unknown:
Bruce E Didesch, Alan C Stay, Deborah E. Nelson and others
503) 226-0259 (fax:
Robert C. Weaver, Jr.
509) 634-2387 (fax:
Stephen H. Suagee and Stephen H. Suagee
503) 242-9001 (fax:
Craig J. Dorsay and Lea Ann Easton
303) 673-9155 (fax:
Christopher B. Leahy
202) 616-9667 (fax:
Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon and others
541) 737-3590 (fax:
Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
208) 334-2690 (fax:
William Stuart Whelan
Defendant:
Makah Tribe, State of Oregon and State of Washington
503) 467-7689 (fax:
Robert S. Banks, Jr.
503) 947-4793 (fax:
David Euan Leith
503) 226-0079 (fax:
Lori Irish Bauman
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 3371 Wildlife Under the Lacey Act
S'Klallam, et al v. Lummi Indian Tribe, et al
as 09-35772
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWER ELWHA BAND OF KLALLAMS, Lower Elwha Band of S'Klallams, JAMESTOWN BAND OF KLALLAMS, Jamestown Band of S'Klallams and PORT GAMBLE BAND CLALLAM, Pt. Gamble Band of S'Klallams
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
TULALIP TRIBE
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE
Real-party-in-interest:
PUYALLUP TRIBE, MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Re: Treaty Tribes' Request for Dispute Resolution Re: Request for Intervention and Coverage in Settlement Agreement
as 2:1989sp00306
Plaintiff:
Squaxin Island Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers, Taylor United Inc, Olympia Oyster Co and others
USA, et al v. State of Washington
as 09-80008
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, TULALIP TRIBES, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
Michael Evans, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 08-35938
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. EVANS, in his capacity as Chairman of the Snohomish Tribe of Indians and SNOHOMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
TULALIP TRIBES OF THE TULALIP RESERVATION
Suquamish Indian Tribe v. Tulalip Tribes
as 2:2008sp00001
Petitioner:
Suquamish Indian Tribe
Respondent:
Tulalip Tribes
Amicu:
Purse Seine Vessel Owners Association and Washington Trollers Association
USA v. State of Washington, et al
as 08-35794
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, SWINOMISH TRIBAL COMMUNITY, LUMMI NATION and others
Movant - Appellant:
SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Amicus Curiae:
THE SNOHOMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS AND ITS CHAIRMAN MICHAEL C. EVANS
Upper Skagit Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 07-35061
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION and others
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Cross-claimant - Appellee:
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
