Cases 51 - 60 of 150
CATERBONE v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CUTCHIN v. BRADLEY
as 3:2017cv00012
Petitioner:
DEMANNE KENNETH CUTCHIN
Respondent:
E. BRADLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00078
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caterbone v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2016cv02513
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALSTON v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2016cv05768
Petitioner:
RICKY T. ALSTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CATERBONE v. OBAMA et al
as 5:2016cv04641
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
BARRACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caterbone v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferranti v. Lane
as 3:2016cv00866
Petitioner:
Jack Ferranti
Respondent:
Kathy Lane and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
IN RE: GRAHAM
as 2:2016cv00047
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
