Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Walters v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02147
Plaintiff: John E. Walters
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Althoff v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02124
Plaintiff: John Walter Althoff
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wheelock et al v. State of Rhode Island, et al.
as 1:2006cv00366
Plaintiff: Kenneth Wilson
Defendant: State of Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Carcieri, Ashbel T. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belleville v. United Food and Commercial Workers International union Industry Pension Fund et al
as 1:2007cv00384
Plaintiff: Ralph Belleville
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers International union Industry Pension Fund, Carl C Huber, Joseph T Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rutherford v. Davol, Inc., et al
as 1:2007cv01891
Plaintiff: Walter W. Rutherford
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff: Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant: Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party: Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00225
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Norman Laurence v. A.T. Wall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff: Norman Laurence
Defendant: A.T. Wall, George A. Vose, Jake Gadsden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?