Cases filed in South Dakota
Cases 51 - 60 of 61
United States of America v. Morse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv04098
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Adam Shane Morse, Mitchel Morse, Centerville Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bordeaux We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03015
Petitioner: Adam C. Bordeaux
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Twedt v. Dupic et al
as 4:2010cv04028
Plaintiff: David Twedt
Defendant: Adam Dupic and City of Canton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucero v. Bush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv05063
Plaintiff: Chery A. Lucero
Defendant: James G. Bush, Adam Martin, Michelle Boehrs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Neitzke et al v. Lowrance We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv04028
Plaintiff: Mark Neitzke, Paul A Vis, Julie Vis and others
Defendant: Jeff Lowrance
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Adams v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv04139
Plaintiff: Robert G. Adams
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boggs v. Dooley et al
as 4:2008cv04009
Plaintiff: Adam Boggs
Defendant: Robert Dooley and Lori Dietch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wines v. Whitehill
as 4:2007cv04179
Plaintiff: Howard K. Wines
Defendant: Adam Whitehill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oliver v. State of South Dakota
as 5:2007cv05054
Petitioner: Daniel Adam Oliver
Respondent: State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. State of South Dakota
as 5:2007cv05021
Petitioner: Daniel Adam Oliver
Respondent: State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?