Cases 51 - 60 of 119
The Ostrom Company v American Fidelity Assurance Company, et al
as 3:2014cv05767
Plaintiff:
The Ostrom Company
Defendant:
American Fidelity Assurance Company , Elite Brokerage Services, Inc. , HealthSmart Benefits Solutions Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Willis of Oregon Inc.
Counter_defendant:
The Ostrom Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoo v. Obenland
as 2:2014cv01425
Petitioner:
Willie James McCoo
Respondent:
Mike Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mahoney et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Mahoney, Sjon C Stevens, Cliff Borjeson and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, City of Seattle , Ed Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taite v. Thomas
as 2:2013cv00351
Petitioner:
Marcus Orlando Taite
Respondent:
Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Snider-Willis v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05838
Plaintiff:
Laurie Snider-Willis
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hughes v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv05699
Plaintiff:
Willie Hughes
Defendant:
United States of America, Daniel Werfel, Jean Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Mayes v. Clallam Bay Correctional Center et al
as 2:2013cv01452
Petitioner:
Willie J Mayes
Respondent:
Clallam Bay Correctional Center and Mike O'Beland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2013cv01063
Plaintiff:
Willie R Adams
Defendant:
Daniel Satterbreg, Jay Inslee and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Harris, Jr. v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05268
Plaintiff:
Willie Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Willis v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05211
Plaintiff:
Darrel Patrick Willis
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
