Cases 51 - 60 of 99
FLADUNG et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMER. et al
as 1:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
MARY FLADUNG and PHIL FLADUNG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
CROWN HOLDINGS, LLC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2015cv00013
Defendant:
BERKLEY RISK ADMINISTRATORS COMPANY, LLC, JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
CROWN HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Hanson v. City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2014cv00398
Plaintiff:
Violet Hanson
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
David R Dyson
Defendant:
Patrick Donahoe, United States Postal Services Gary P & DC, Gary, Indiana, Lawanda Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Vazquez v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2014cv00153
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Zuriel Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC v. RICHEY et al
as 1:2013cv02006
Defendant:
ARGENT MORTGAGE, CO., LLC, MICHAEL A. BENEDICT, CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Wilson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wilson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
