Cases 51 - 60 of 101,144
Poe v. Vanwynsberg
as 4:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Vanwynsberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CARGILL MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED, GOOD SOURCE SOLUTIONS and others
Interested Party:
GLENN ANDREW SCUTERI, TIFFANY ROSE SCUTERI and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alward v. FCI Oxford et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Defendant:
FCI Oxford, Lt Broesch and Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Pyles v. Ryan Strebing, et al
as 24-1797
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. PYLES
Defendant:
RYAN STREBING and ALEX FRESHOUR
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perkins, Eric v. Fuchs, Warden
as 3:2024cv00301
Petitioner:
Eric G. Perkins
Respondent:
Warden Fuchs
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTSON v. GARCIA
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
JEROME D. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
