Cases 61 - 70 of 441,099
Butler v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Scott Lee, Brian Davenport, City of Cleburne Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCormick v. Driscoll
as 4:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
Jordan McCormick
Defendant:
Garrett Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Panola County et al
as 6:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kristeen Brooke Adams
Defendant:
Panola County, Panola County Sheriff's Dept, Panola County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. delivery.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
delivery.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dowling v. United States Attorney's Office
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. W. Kenneth Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
Defendant:
W. Kenneth Paxton and Jane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Telsync Technologies LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Villalva v. KIN, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Josefina Villalva
Defendant:
KIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
