Cases 61 - 70 of 1,343
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schelin v. Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services
as 6:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Schelin
Defendant:
Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services et al
as 9:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael T Anderson
Defendant:
Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services and Missoula Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons v. Warner
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roxella Lyons
Defendant:
Rebecca Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shideler et al v. Gootkin et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Shideler and Terrie Holscher
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Wayne Harris, Kenneth Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Grigg v. Benson
as 9:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
Barbara Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
