Cases 61 - 70 of 17,727
***CASE ABANDONED OPENED IN ERROR SEE 4:24-cv-00302-SRB *** v. Jeter
as 4:2024cv00303
Defendant:
Cooper Jeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mantia et al v. Trenholm Mechanical Insulation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Ross Mantia, Maggie Shrout, Dominic Pavia and others
Defendant:
Trenholm Mechanical Insulation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Malic v. Lennox Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Adin Malic
Defendant:
Lennox Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leija et al v. Lakeside Foods, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Jose Leija and Leticia Leija
Defendant:
Lakeside Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parker v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Josh Parker
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wineman v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Brenda Wineman
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mosure v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
James Mosure
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hill v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Minnie Hill
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Spaan v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 8:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Joel Spaan
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Alexander v. Herrera Solutions, INC et al
as 5:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Quincey J. Alexander
Defendant:
Herrera Solutions, INC and Nick Herrera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
