Cases 61 - 70 of 201
Smith v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv04005
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Walker, Sergeant Golden and Miller County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2022cv04004
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Jones
Defendant:
Warden Tina Maxwell, Assistant Warden Minors, Kristian Lamay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Emsweller et al
as 6:2022cv06002
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Warden/Supervisor Antwon Emsweller and Andrew Rue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Yates
as 3:2021cv03087
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06157
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne, Dr. Guy M. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Settles et al
as 6:2021cv06154
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Paulas Settles, Barbara A. Holliman, Warden Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2021cv05209
Plaintiff:
Darla Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Warden Faust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Settles et al
as 6:2021cv06152
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant Paula Settles, Barbara Holliman, Warden Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Walker et al
as 4:2021cv04088
Plaintiff:
Xavier Juwen Lacey and Xavier Juwon Lacey
Defendant:
Warden Jeffie Walker, Sheriff Jackie Runion, Sergeant Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Captain Adams, et al
as 4:2021cv04083
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Miller County Detention Center, Captain Adams, Sgt. Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
