Cases 61 - 70 of 466
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Deputy Warden Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Devante Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Ray Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARSON v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO CARSON
Defendant:
Captain Coleman, Captain Wicker, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Marcus Coleman
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, South Fulton Police Department, Solomon Muhammad and others
Watkins v. Oxendine et al
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
James W. Oxendine, B.J. Bernstein, Richard Coleman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
