Cases 61 - 70 of 2,872
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woodruff
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woodruff
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amber Grove Owner LLC v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Amber Grove Owner LLC doing business as Amber Grove at Olley Creek
Defendant:
Marquita Jones and and All Other Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
H. Jones, Patrick Labat, Fulton County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
