Cases 61 - 70 of 210
Martin v. USA
as 2:2016cv00215
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jermaine V. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Casarez v. Ingram Barge Company et al
as 2:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Margaret Casarez
Defendant:
Ingram Barge Company and M/V Dale Heller
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
United States of America v. Graestone Logistics LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Graestone Logistics LLC , Glenn E. Daulton, Inc , Bertucci Contracting Co., LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
M/V River Titan , Graestone Logistics LLC , Barge GD-896 and others
Cross_defendant:
Barge GD-896 , Bertucci Contracting Co., LLC , Glenn E. Daulton, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pope v. Carl
as 2:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Russell V. Pope
Defendant:
Terry Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bryant v. Progressive Podiatry, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Bryant
Defendant:
Progressive Podiatry, LLC and Bryan V. Fallis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Carie v. SSA
as 5:2016cv00320
Plaintiff:
James V. Carie
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Guyton v. Quintana et al
as 5:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kevin Guyton
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, V. Dankwa and Anthony Ferrebee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salyer et al v. J.D. Carty Resources, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lahoma Salyer , Gary Salyer , Jimmy Salyer and others
Defendant:
J.D. Carty Resources, LLC, Country Gas, LLC, Anaconda Drilling of KY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
V-Soft Consulting Group, Inc. v. Logic Corporation
as 3:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
V-Soft Consulting Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Logic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2016cv00099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory V. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
