Cases 61 - 70 of 133
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE, ESTATE OF RICHARD ALSTON AND BOBBIE ALSTON, RICHARD LEE ALSTON, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE and SANDRA G YARBROUGH JONES
Consol_defendant:
REAL ESTATE, CARLTON FARMS INC, TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
RAYFIELD SPENCER and REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bankston v. Sewon America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Craig Bankston
Defendant:
Sewon America, Inc. and Chris Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Armstrong
as 1:2015cv03301
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durrence v. City of Brunswick et al
as 2:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Durrence
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Austin Armstrong, Brunswick Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRIS v. CITY OF CAIRO et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
VANESSA MORRIS
Defendant:
CITY OF CAIRO, CHRIS ADDELTON, CAROLYN ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
