Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Barlow et al v. Match.com, LLC
as 3:2011cv01354
Defendant:
Match.com, LLC
Plaintiff:
Guy Barlow, Jr. and Mark H Harken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burden v. Maness et al
as 1:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alan Burden
Defendant:
Tom Maness, Ann Manes, David W Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubea v. Panola College et al
as 2:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey H Dubea
Defendant:
Panola College, Carthage SNF, LP, Carthage GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barlow
Defendant:
Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow et al v. Comerford, Sr. et al
as 4:2009cv03564
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barlow, Robert L Blanchard, Sarah M Doaks and others
Defendant:
Charles R Comerford, Sr., Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Barlow v. Liesby
as 1:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Charles Barlow
Defendant:
UP Liesby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Broussard et al
as 9:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Broussard, Unidentified Putin, Unidentified Christen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barlow v. Russell Stover Candies Inc
as 3:2008cv01442
Plaintiff:
Julia Barlow
Defendant:
Russell Stover Candies Inc and Russell Stover Candies Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nguyen et al v. Highpoint Southwest Services, L.P.
as 4:2007cv04531
Plaintiff:
Long B. Nguyen, James R. Watt and Andre L. Barlow
Defendant:
Highpoint Southwest Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
