Cases 61 - 70 of 250
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al
as 3:2017cv00444
Defendant:
Shelly Aldean, Jim Baetge, Marsha Berkbigler and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gregory Garmong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Noah et al
as 2:2017cv01376
Defendant:
Mike Byrne, Timothy Filson, Williams Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrell v. Beverly et al
as 2:2017cv01241
Defendant:
Leah C Beverly, Cynthia Cruz, Douglas C. Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Houston v. Oxbrough et al
as 3:2017cv00206
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, William Gittereis and others
Plaintiff:
Brick Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guardado v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
as 2:2017cv00879
Defendant:
Quentin Bryne, Tara Carpenter, Bill Connett and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Jord Guardado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
D.T. Marshall, Reese McKinney and Montgomery, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 3:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery, City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery, City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
